What kind of changes do you believe should be done with the NASCAR schedule?
November 20, 2009 by
Filed under nascar schedule
This is just kind of a poll question, but I would like to hear everyone’s ideas. In my opinion, the California and Phoenix tracks should be stripped of both races. One of the races should be returned to Darlington, and two others should be given to Rockingham. As for the remaining race, I think it should either be a road race or another short track that’s not currently on the schedule.
i think they should start the faces at 1 o clock like they used 2!!!
What’s wrong with Pheonix? Not my favorite track, but I’ve never really heard of anyone suggesting eliminating a race (or both) from PIR. I understand them wanting to be in certain markets. So, don’t eliminate any tracks (although I’d like to). Take a date from California, New Hampshire, Pocono, and Martinsville. Give the Southern 500 back to Darlington, give The Rock a race, give one to Iowa (new market, similar to Richmond) and give the last one to somewhere besided Kansas and Chicago.
In my opinion, the California and Phoenix tracks should have One race and give back tracks were they took both races out. and as for the bush race i think the mexico race sucks
I dont think PIR is going to have both races taken away, and I havent heard any talk of that, and personally dont think that they need to. I have heard them talking about taking one race away from NHIS but the thing is they fill up both races. I say take one race away from Texas, add the Montreal road course somewhere in the schedule, preferably in the Chase, because the Chase needs a roadcourse. Maybe take one away from Michigan and or Pocono, and add the track in Nashville and then the one up in Minnesota I believe, that the Busch Series races at. I think that somehow the Montreal race needs to be incorpriated into the schedule, because its definitely better then the Mexico City road course. It would be nice to have another race at Darlington and to have another race at Rockingham but I dont see them changing the schedule anytime soon.
yes but theyt should take 1 race from each
Darlington should have one
thhe other should go to the Rock
if they pull both one should go to the Kentucky speedway
the other to St. Louis(Gateway)
sounds good to me
Rockingham….lol Those races were taken away for many reasons and NASCAR will never be there again. The weather sucked every year for the first race. It only holds 60,000 people and still didn’t sell out in its later years. Theres like 4 hotels within 100 square miles. Won’t happen.
I think the schedule is fine except I wouldn’t mind losing a Martinsville date or even a Talladega race considering the actual racing is only the last 20 laps.
Cali should be stripped of their races. So should Kansas and Las Vegas and Chicago. Those cookie cutter tracks are BORING. Rockingham should get a race. Darlington should get the Labor Day race back. Texas should lose one race, giving it to Iowa Speedway, a track similar to Richmond. A road corse race should be placed in the Chase. Pocono races should be brought down to 400 miles, 500 is to long for that track.
eliminate all racing in california they have show over and over they dont want or deserve any races
if they wanted nascar there they would sellout but they dont proving my point
Get rid of 1 California Race –They Never sell out and give it to Darlington.–Put a road Course into the Chase!!!!!!!–Take away 1 of the Pocono races and give that date to Rockingham!!!!!
I think they should put a road course race in the chase.
one race a year per track is my opinion.take away all tracks that have 2. yes even daytona and talladega. make the squedule shorter and give back darlington and the rock.
drop a Cali race and pick up Kentucky speedway
I agree with you!! California=zzzzzzz, Phoenix is ok, but… The “Southern 500″ needs to be returned to Darlington and definitely bring back the Rock!!!